eISSN: 2077-9135 / ISSN: 1681-5491
Register
Login
Reviewer Guidelines

GUIDELINES FOR OBJECTIVE REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS

 

 

SCORE GUIDE (To be used by the Referee/Reviewer)

Not Given/Not Relevant

0

Below Standard

1

Average

2

Satisfactory

3

Good

4

Very Good

5

 

 

Manuscript Reg. No...................................................... Reviewer’s Name.........................................................

 

 

Description of the Part of Manuscript

Score

TITLE

Accurate

 

Effective

 

RepTesents Main Message of Paper

 

ABSTRACT

Size of abstract

 

Summary of Introduction

 

Study Design

 

 Material and Methods

 

Results

 

Discussion

 

Conclusion

 

DIFFICULT WORDS/KEY WORDS IF RELEVANT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

If start Relevant

 

Subject of Paper Made Clear

 

Importance of Study Made Clear

 

Reasons for the Study Stated

 

Significant finding of the Study Stated

 

International Literature of past 10 years Recorded.

 

National Literature of past 10 years Recorded

 

Ancient Literature Reviewed and Recorded

 

References appropriate for Discussion not given in Introduction

 

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Are clearly Stated

 

Are addressed in the study

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Population of uniform standard

 

Sample selection criteria reliable

 

Inclusion/Exclusion criteria specified

 

Control within the study or literature given

 

Important Variable Measurement Criteria specified..

 

Criteria to measure outcome relevant

 

Investigation/Procedure/Technique clearly given

 

RESULTS AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS

Presentation of results clear

 

Data satisfies objectives of the study

 

All subjects/Variable in the study accounted for..

 

Results reported the drop out (if present)

 

Results presented in Free

 

Results presented with Frequency Distribution

 

Results presented with standard deviation

 

Appropriate statistical tests applied

 

Data Analysis correctly interpreted

 

Level of significance (preferred less than 0.1%)..

 

DISCUSSION

Important findings and results discussed

 

New emerging findings discussed

 

Results of the study discussed with others in literature

 

Questions raised in the study

 

Results and analysis leads to firm conclusions

 

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions justified by the results/findings

 

Conclusions relevant to the aims and objectives of the study.

 

Conclusions based on critical argument

 

WRITTEN ENGLISH

Spellings

 

Grammar

 

REPORT (State clearly approved-advised revision rejected)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

Reviewer Signature………………………….                                    Date……………….

Medical Channel Journal
support@medicalchanneljournal.pk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license. Open Access Publication.
Copyright © ©Medical Channel Journal. All rights reserved.
|
|
|